A magnetic resonance conditional robot for lumbar spinal injection: Development and preliminary validation.

PURPOSE: This work presents the design and preliminary validation of a Magnetic Resonance (MR) conditional robot for lumbar injection for the treatment of lower back pain. METHODS: This is a 4-degree-of-freedom (DOF) robot that is 200 × 230 × 130 mm3 in volume and has a mass of 0.8 kg. Its lightweight and compact features allow it to be directly affixed to patient's back, establishing a rigid connection, thus reducing positional errors caused by patient movements during treatment. RESULTS: To validate the positioning accuracy of the needle by the robot, an electromagnetic (EM) tracking system and a needle with an EM sensor embedded in the tip were used for the free space evaluation with position accuracy of 0.88 ± 0.46 mm and phantom mock insertions using the Loop-X CBCT scanner with target position accuracy of 3.62 ± 0.92 mm. CONCLUSION: Preliminary experiments demonstrated that the proposed robot showed improvements and benefits in its rotation range, flexible needle adjustment, and sensor protection compared with previous and existing systems, offering broader clinical applications.

Intrathecal Gene Therapy for Giant Axonal Neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Giant axonal neuropathy is a rare, autosomal recessive, pediatric, polysymptomatic, neurodegenerative disorder caused by biallelic loss-of-function variants in GAN, the gene encoding gigaxonin. METHODS: We conducted an intrathecal dose-escalation study of scAAV9/JeT-GAN (a self-complementary adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy containing the GAN transgene) in children with giant axonal neuropathy. Safety was the primary end point. The key secondary clinical end point was at least a 95% posterior probability of slowing the rate of change (i.e., slope) in the 32-item Motor Function Measure total percent score at 1 year after treatment, as compared with the pretreatment slope. RESULTS: One of four intrathecal doses of scAAV9/JeT-GAN was administered to 14 participants - 3.5×1013 total vector genomes (vg) (in 2 participants), 1.2×1014 vg (in 4), 1.8×1014 vg (in 5), and 3.5×1014 vg (in 3). During a median observation period of 68.7 months (range, 8.6 to 90.5), of 48 serious adverse events that had occurred, 1 (fever) was possibly related to treatment; 129 of 682 adverse events were possibly related to treatment. The mean pretreatment slope in the total cohort was -7.17 percentage points per year (95% credible interval, -8.36 to -5.97). At 1 year after treatment, posterior mean changes in slope were -0.54 percentage points (95% credible interval, -7.48 to 6.28) with the 3.5×1013-vg dose, 3.23 percentage points (95% credible interval, -1.27 to 7.65) with the 1.2×1014-vg dose, 5.32 percentage points (95% credible interval, 1.07 to 9.57) with the 1.8×1014-vg dose, and 3.43 percentage points (95% credible interval, -1.89 to 8.82) with the 3.5×1014-vg dose. The corresponding posterior probabilities for slowing the slope were 44% (95% credible interval, 43 to 44); 92% (95% credible interval, 92 to 93); 99% (95% credible interval, 99 to 99), which was above the efficacy threshold; and 90% (95% credible interval, 89 to 90). Between 6 and 24 months after gene transfer, sensory-nerve action potential amplitudes increased, stopped declining, or became recordable after being absent in 6 participants but remained absent in 8. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal gene transfer with scAAV9/JeT-GAN for giant axonal neuropathy was associated with adverse events and resulted in a possible benefit in motor function scores and other measures at some vector doses over a year. Further studies are warranted to determine the safety and efficacy of intrathecal AAV-mediated gene therapy in this disorder. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02362438.).

Intrathecal Injection of Newborn Mouse for Genome Editing and Drug Delivery.

Intrathecal injection is a commonly employed procedure in both pediatric and adult clinics, serving as an effective means to administer medications and treatments. By directly delivering medications and treatments into the cerebrospinal fluid of the central nervous system, this method achieves higher localized drug concentrations while reducing systemic side-effects compared to other routes such as intravenous, subcutaneous, or intramuscular injections. Its importance extends beyond clinical settings, as intrathecal injection plays a vital role in preclinical studies focused on treating neurogenetic disorders in rodents and other large animals, including non-human primates. However, despite its widespread application, intrathecal injection in young, particularly neonatal pups, poses significant technical challenges due to their small size and fragile nature. Successful and reliable administration of intrathecal injections in newborn mice requires meticulous attention to detail and careful consideration of various factors. Thus, there is a crucial need for a standardized protocol that not only provides instructions but also highlights key technical considerations and good laboratory practices to ensure procedural consistency, as well as the safety and welfare of the animals. To address this unmet need, we present a detailed and comprehensive protocol for performing intrathecal injections specifically in newborn pups on postnatal day 1 (P1). By following the step-by-step instructions, researchers can confidently perform intrathecal injections in neonatal pups, enabling the accurate delivery of drugs, antisense oligos, and viruses for gene replacement or genome editing-based treatments. Furthermore, the importance of adhering to good laboratory practices is emphasized to maintain the well-being of animals and ensure reliable experimental outcomes. This protocol aims to address the technical challenges associated with intrathecal injections in neonatal mice, ultimately facilitating advances in the field of neurogenetic research that aims to develop potential therapeutic interventions.

Safety and Efficacy of Apitegromab in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Types 2 and 3: The Phase 2 TOPAZ Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Currently approved therapies for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) reverse the degenerative course, leading to better functional outcome, but they do not address the impairment arising from preexisting neurodegeneration. Apitegromab, an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody, inhibits activation of myostatin (a negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth), thereby preserving muscle mass. The phase 2 TOPAZ trial assessed the safety and efficacy of apitegromab in individuals with later-onset type 2 and type 3 SMA. METHODS: In this study, designed to investigate potential meaningful combinations of eligibility and treatment regimen for future studies, participants aged 2-21 years received IV apitegromab infusions every 4 weeks for 12 months in 1 of 3 cohorts. Cohort 1 stratified ambulatory participants aged 5-21 years into 2 arms (apitegromab 20 mg/kg alone or in combination with nusinersen); cohort 2 evaluated apitegromab 20 mg/kg combined with nusinersen in nonambulatory participants aged 5-21 years; and cohort 3 blindly evaluated 2 randomized apitegromab doses (2 and 20 mg/kg) combined with nusinersen in younger participants ≥2 years of age. The primary efficacy measure was mean change from baseline using the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale version appropriate for each cohort. Data were analyzed using a paired t test with 2-sided 5% type 1 error for the mean change from baseline for predefined cohort-specific primary efficacy end points. RESULTS: Fifty-eight participants (mean age 9.4 years) were enrolled at 16 trial sites in the United States and Europe. Participants had been treated with nusinersen for a mean of 25.9 months before enrollment in any of the 3 trial cohorts. At month 12, the mean change from baseline in Hammersmith scale score was -0.3 points (95% CI -2.1 to 1.4) in cohort 1 (n = 23), 0.6 points (-1.4 to 2.7) in cohort 2 (n = 15), and in cohort 3 (n = 20), the mean scores were 5.3 (-1.5 to 12.2) and 7.1 (1.8 to 12.5) for the 2-mg/kg (n = 8) and 20-mg/kg (n = 9) arms, respectively. The 5 most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (24.1%), pyrexia (22.4%), upper respiratory tract infection (22.4%), cough (22.4%), and nasopharyngitis (20.7%). No deaths or serious adverse reactions were reported. DISCUSSION: Apitegromab led to improved motor function in participants with later-onset types 2 and 3 SMA. These results support a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of apitegromab in participants with SMA. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03921528). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that apitegromab improves motor function in later-onset types 2 and 3 spinal muscular atrophy.

Intrathecal morphine delivery at prepontine cistern to control refractory cancer-related pain: a case report of extensive metastatic and refractory cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: Extensive metastatic and refractory cancer pain is common, and exhibits a dissatisfactory response to the conventional intrathecal infusion of opioid analgesics. CASE PRESENTATION: The present study reports a case of an extensive metastatic esophageal cancer patient with severe intractable pain, who underwent translumbar subarachnoid puncture with intrathecal catheterization to the prepontine cistern. After continuous infusion of low-dose morphine, the pain was well-controlled with a decrease in the numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain score from 9 to 0, and the few adverse reactions to the treatment disappeared at a low dose of morphine. CONCLUSIONS: The patient achieved a good quality of life during the one-month follow-up period.

Biodistribution of Radioactively Labeled Splice Modulating Antisense Oligonucleotides After Intracerebroventricular and Intrathecal Injection in Mice.

Antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) are promising therapeutic candidates, especially for neurological diseases. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection is the predominant route of administration in mouse studies, while in clinical trials, intrathecal (IT) administration is mostly used. There is little knowledge on the differences in distribution of these injection methods within the same species over time. In this study, we compared the distribution of splice-switching AONs targeting exon 15 of amyloid precursor protein pre-mRNA injected via the ICV and IT route in mice. The AON was labeled with radioactive indium-111 and mice were imaged using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) 0, 4, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after injection. In vivo SPECT imaging showed 111In-AON activity diffused throughout the central nervous system (CNS) in the first hours after injection. The 111In-AON activity in the CNS persisted over the course of 4 days, while signal in the kidneys rapidly decreased. Postmortem counting in different organs and tissues showed very similar distribution of 111In-AON activity throughout the body, while the signal in the different brain regions was higher with ICV injection. Overall, IT and ICV injection have very similar distribution patterns in the mouse, but ICV injection is much more effective in reaching the brain.

Intrathecal injection of human placental mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes significantly improves functional recovery in spinal cord injured rats.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) due to lack of restoration of damaged neuronal cells is associated with sensorimotor impairment. This study was focused on using the human placental mesenchymal stem cells- exosome (HPMSCs- Exosomes) in an animal model of severe SCI under myelogram procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Intrathecal injection of exosomes was performed in the acute phase of SCI in female rats. The improved functional recovery of the animals was followed for 6 weeks in control (saline, n = 6) and HPMSCs- EXO (HPMSCs-Exosomes, n = 6) groups. Pathological changes and glial scar size were evaluated. The Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of GFAP and NF200 factors as well as the apoptosis assay was investigated in the tissue samples from the injury site. The results demonstrated that HPMSCs-exosomes can improve motor function by attenuating apoptosis of neurons at the injury site, decreasing GFAP expression and increasing NF200 in the HPMSCs-EXO group. Also, HPMSCs-exosomes by preventing the formation of cavities causes preservation of tissue in SCI rats. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of HPMSC-Exosomes as a therapeutic method to improve functional recovery, reduce pathological changes associated with injury, and prevent chronicity after SCI. The neuroprotective and anti-apoptotic potential of HPMSCs- Exosomes may be a promising therapeutic approach for SCI. Another result was the importance of intrathecal injection of exosomes in the acute phase, which accelerated the healing process. Furthermore, the myelogram can be a feasible and suitable method to confirm the accuracy of intrathecal injection and examine the subarachnoid space in the laboratory animals.

Intrathecal baclofen for the management of hereditary spastic paraparesis: a systematic review.

This systematic review aims to evaluate the use of intrathecal baclofen (ITB) for hereditary spastic paraparesis (HSP) treatment. An extensive search in two electronical databases was performed. We identified articles published between 1990 and 2022 (PubMed, Scopus), and applied the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of HSP at the time of the intervention, either familial or sporadic; report on the effect of ITB in patients with HSP; test trial via either bolus injections or continuous infusion tests; and ITB pump implantation. A data extraction sheet based on the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group's data extraction template was created and adapted to collect relevant data. A qualitative analysis was performed to present the results in narrative summary fashion. A total of 6 studies met our inclusion criteria. 51 patients with HSP had a pre-implantation ITB trial. The time since the diagnosis until the pump implantation ranged from 5 to 30 years. The initial bolus ranged from 20 to 50 µg and the mean doses used at steady state ranged from 65 to 705 µg. An improvement in spasticity was observed on the modified Ashworth Scale in patients treated with ITB. Although all studies reported a subjective gait improvement, not all found an objective improvement in gait. The most common side effect reported was catheter-related problems. The findings of this review support the use of ITB as an effective and a viable option for the treatment of spasticity in HSP refractory to conservative therapies.

Intrathecal injections of angiotensin IV and oxytocin conjugates induce antihyperalgesia and antiallodynia in both sexes of rats.

Our previous studies have established that intrathecal oxytocin (OT) and angiotensin IV (Ang IV) injections induce antihyperalgesia and antiallodynia in rodents. Ang IV, a renin-angiotensin system hexapeptide, acts as an endogenous inhibitor that inhibits the oxytocin-degrading enzyme insulin-regulated aminopeptidase (IRAP). The pain inhibitory effects by Ang IV were found to be through its inhibition on IRAP to potentiate the effect of OT. However, these effects were found to be with a significant sex difference, which could be partially due to the higher expression of IRAP at the spinal cords of female. Therefore, we synthesized Ang IV and OT conjugates connected with a peptide bond and tested for their effects on hyperalgesia and allodynia. Carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia and partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL) were performed using rat models. Conjugates Ang IV-OT (Ang IV at the N-terminal) and OT-Ang IV (OT at the N-terminal) were synthesized and intrathecally injected into male and female rats. Our results showed that Ang IV-OT exhibited prominent antihyperalgesia in male rats, particularly during hyperalgesia recovery, whereas OT-Ang IV was more effective during development stage. Ang IV-OT showed clear antihyperalgesia in female rats, but OT-Ang IV had no significant effect. Notably, both conjugates alleviated neuropathic allodynia in male rats; however, OT-Ang IV had no effect in female rats, whereas Ang IV-OT induced significant antiallodynia. In conclusion, Ang IV-OT has greater therapeutic potential for treating hyperalgesia and allodynia than OT-Ang IV. Its effects were not affected by sex, unlike those of OT and OT-Ang IV, extending its possible clinical applications.

Comparison of the effect of dexmedetomidine intrathecal injection and intravenous infusion on subarachnoid blockade during knee arthroscopy procedures: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Comparison of whether intrathecal dexmedetomidine prolongs spinal anesthesia-associated sensorimotor blockade more than intravenous infusion during knee arthroscopy procedures performed under subarachnoid blockade. METHODS: Ninety patients aged 18-75 years, ASA class I-II, who underwent knee arthroscopy between October 2022 and April 2023 were randomized into intrathecal、intravenous and control groups.Subjects received three modes of administration: an intrathecal group (2 ml of 1% ropivacaine + 1 ml of 5 µg dexmedetomidine, along with intravenous saline infusion), an intravenous group (intrathecal 2 ml of 1% ropivacaine + 1 ml of 0.9% saline, with dexmedetomidine pumped intravenously at a dose of 0.5 µg/kg/h), and a control group (intrathecal 2 ml of 1% ropivacaine + 1 ml of 0.9% saline, along with intravenous saline infusion). Total analgesic duration, duration of sensory and motor blockade, Ramsay sedation score, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at different postoperative time points, and occurrence of adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: The total analgesia duration was significantly longer in the intrathecal group than in the intravenous and control groups (352.13 ± 51.70 min VS 273.47 ± 62.57 min VS 241.41 ± 59.22 min, P < 0.001).The onset of sensory block was shorter in the intrathecal group than in the intravenous and control groups (4 [3-4]min VS 5 [4-5]min VS 5 [4-5]min; P < 0.001);the onset of motor block was shorter in the intrathecal group than in the intravenous group and the control group (5 [4-5]min VS 5 [5-6]min VS 6[5.5-7]min; P < 0.001).Sedation scores were higher in the intravenous group than in the intrathecal and control groups (P < 0.001). At 5 h postoperatively, the VAS score in the intrathecal group was lower than that in the intravenous and control groups (P < 0.001). At 24 h postoperatively, the VAS score in the intrathecal group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.001). In addition, the incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the intravenous group than in the intrathecal and control groups (30%, 6.5%, and 3.4%, respectively; P = 0.018, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal administration of dexmedetomidine did prolong the total analgesia duration, as well as accelerate the onset of sensory-motor blockade compared with intravenous infusion, and did not result in any hemodynamic instability or other adverse events at the doses studied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This single-center, prospective, RCT has completed the registration of the Chinese Clinical Trial Center at 26/09/2023 with the registration number ChiCTR2300076170.

The Incidence and Predictors of Failed Spinal Anesthesia After Intrathecal Injection of Local Anesthetic for Cesarean Delivery: A Single-Center, 9-Year Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of failed spinal anesthesia varies widely in the obstetric literature. Although many risk factors have been suggested, their relative predictive value is unknown. The primary objective of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia for cesarean deliveries at a tertiary care obstetric hospital, and its secondary objectives were to identify predictors of failed spinal anesthesia in the obstetrics population and quantify their relative importance in a predictive model for failure. METHODS: With local institutional ethics committee approval, a retrospective review of our hospital database identified the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia for 5361 cesarean deliveries between 2010 and 2019. We performed a multivariable analysis to assess the association of predictors with failure and a dominance analysis to assess the importance of each predictor. RESULTS: The incidence of failed spinal anesthesia requiring an alternative anesthetic was 2.1%, with conversion to general anesthesia occurring in 0.7% of surgeries. Supplemental analgesia or sedation was provided to an additional 2.0% of women. The most important predictors of a failed spinal anesthetic were previous cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR], 11.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.09-18.20; P < .001), concomitant tubal ligation (OR, 8.23; 95% CI, 3.12-19.20; P < .001), lower body mass index (BMI) (kg·m -2 , OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98; P = .005), and longer surgery duration (minutes, OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P = .006). Previous cesarean delivery was the most significant risk factor, contributing to 9.6% of the total 17% variance predicted by all predictors examined. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia failed to provide a pain-free surgery in 4.1% of our cesarean deliveries. Previous cesarean delivery was the most important predictor of spinal failure. Other important predictors included tubal ligation, lower BMI, and longer surgery duration.

Intrathecal injection of methotrexate and dexamethasone for vasculitis granuloma of the fourth ventricle: a case report and literature review.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a pauci-immune small vessel vasculitis characterised by neutrophil-mediated vasculitis and granuloma. The presence of intracranial parenchymal space-occupying lesions is rarely seen in GPA patients. In this manuscript, we report a case of GPA with granuloma of the fourth ventricle accompanied by obstructive hydrocephalus. Treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) and multiple immunosuppressants cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and rituximab (RTX) showed poor efficacy in this case. After removal of the granuloma by craniotomy, GPA relapsed within 3 months. Under the premise of GC and MMF treatment combined with intrathecal injection of dexamethasone (DXM) and methotrexate (MTX), the intracranial granuloma gradually shrank, and the patient's general condition was alleviated, showing that this is an effective treatment method. Key Points • To date, there are few reports of granulomatous vasculitis combined with granuloma of the fourth ventricle, and our case is the second. • In this case, multiple immunosuppressants and rituximab were ineffective treatments, and the intracranial granuloma was effectively controlled by intrathecal injection of dexamethasone (DXM) and methotrexate (MTX). • Based on this report, it can be suggested that intrathecal injection is effective in treating patients with GPA and central nervous system involvement, but large-scale sample studies are needed.

Refinement of intrathecal catheter design to enhance neuraxial distribution.

BACKGROUND: Delivery of therapeutics via indwelling intrathecal catheters is highly efficacious for targeting of pain, spasticity, neuraxial cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. However, current catheter designs have some major limitations. Given limited CSF flow, fixed intrathecal volume and the large distance of the rostro-caudal spinal axis, current intrathecal delivery routes fail to achieve adequate drug distribution. Additionally open catheter systems are plagued with cellular ingrowth and debris accumulation if used intermittently. NEW METHOD: RESULTS/COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): High speed imaging showed micro-valve catheters greatly increase fluid exit velocities compared to typical open-ended catheters, which prevents pooling of injectate proximal to the opening. When implanted intrathecally in rats, small injection volumes (7.5 µL) of dye or AAV9-RFP, resulted in an even rostro-caudal distribution along the spinal axis and robust transfection of neurons from cervical to lumbar dorsal root ganglia. In contrast, such injections with an open-ended catheter resulted in localized distribution and transfection proximal to the delivery site. Our poly micro-valve catheter design resulted in equivalent transfection rates of cervical DRG neurons using 100x lower titer of AAV9-RFP. Unlike open port catheters, no debris accumulation was observed in the lumen of implanted catheters, showing potential for long-term intermittent use. CONCLUSIONS: This catheter platform, suitable for small animal models is easily scalable for human use and addresses many of the problems observed with common catheter systems.

Intrathecal drug-infusion system for treating pain in advanced cancer: New research in patient management.

Currently, the treatment of cancer pain in China mainly follows the three-step pain relief principles formulated by the World Health Organization. As research on subarachnoid drug diffusion has intensified, intrathecal drug delivery has been gradually applied in the treatment of diseases, and improved analgesia can be achieved via the continuous infusion of small doses of morphine-derived drugs. This method can not only effectively relieve pain and enhance quality of life but also significantly reduce the incidence of nausea, vomiting, constipation, and other adverse reactions caused by the long-term intensive use of drugs in patients with cancer pain. This study summarizes the development of the intrathecal drug-infusion system for treating cancer pain in patients with advanced cancer and describes the drugs used, the advantages in pain treatment, and key nursing factors before and after device placement to provide a basis for alleviating pain in patients with cancer.

Differences in efficacy and safety between intrathecal infusion devices in cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal infusion therapy is widely accepted for cancer pain patients when conventional analgesic treatments are not sufficient. There are different types of devices for carrying out this therapy: partially externalized devices (PED), used when life expectancy is under 3 months, and totally implanted devices (TID), when it is larger. Our objective is to compare the efficacy, functionality, and complication rate in both types. METHODS: We included 132 patients with mild-severe cancer pain, treated with intrathecal infusion therapy by fixed flow devices, PED, or TID, during the study time. Demographic, physical oncologic, and pain control data of the patients were recorded prior to starting therapy and at months 1, 3, and 6. Functionality status and complications were also collected from the patient's medical records and clinical files. RESULTS: Pain control improved after starting therapy, with an overall reduction of 4.75 points in VAS score at 1 month in the both groups, without significant differences between them, keeping it at 3 months and 6. 33.3% of the patients developed complications and were more frequent in the PED group, being catheter dislocation the most common. Patients with TID required more often hospital admission to solve the complication. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal infusion therapy has been shown to be a very effective and safe therapy for the treatment of moderate to severe oncologic pain. There are no significant differences between PED and TID in terms of degree of pain control, therapeutic success, efficacy on episodic or nocturnal pain, or the presence of serious complications.

Safety and efficacy of intrathecal baclofen trials for the treatment of hypertonia: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) is an effective treatment for refractory hypertonia in children. ITB has long been effective for the treatment of spasticity, and indications have naturally evolved to include dystonia and mixed pediatric movement disorders (PMDs). The established uses for ITB trials are insurance prerequisite, mixed tone, and family request. Despite agreement for ITB therapy by a multidisciplinary group of subspecialists in a complex PMD program, insurance companies often require an ITB trial be performed. A longitudinal cohort was identified to determine the safety and efficacy of ITB trials and to determine the utility of test dosing in this population. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis was performed for patients with hypertonia who underwent ITB bolus trials at the authors' institution between 2021 and 2023. Nonmodifiable risk factors and clinical variables were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (11 female) underwent 32 ITB trials. Of these patients, 67.7% had a diagnosis of mixed hypertonia, 32.3% pure spasticity, and 9.1% secondary dystonia. The mean age at test dose was 12.8 years, and 58.1% of patients were born premature. The mode Gross Motor Function Classification System score was 5. The mean difference in Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS) scores was -7.33 points (p = 0.01) at 2.5 hours postoperatively. The mean difference in upper-extremity modified Ashworth Scale (mAS) scores was -5.36 points (p = 0.003), and that for lower-extremity mAS scores was -6.61 (p < 0.001). In total, 21.9% of patients developed a post-dural puncture headache. Conversion to a permanent baclofen pump was performed in 22/32 (68.8%) patients. Of those who did not pursue pump placement, 1 patient had high surgical risk, 1 had an ineffective response, 1 had a bad reaction to the test dose and cited both regression and increased discomfort, and 2 declined despite an effective trial owing to family preferences. CONCLUSIONS: ITB trials require hospitalization in some form and carry risks of procedural complications. The decision to pursue a trial should be made on a case-by-case basis by clinicians and should not be determined by insurance companies. The complication rate of ITB trials is high, and a test dose is unnecessary in this fragile population.

Comparison of intrathecal low-dose bupivacaine and morphine with intravenous patient control analgesia for postoperative analgesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Thoracoscopic surgical techniques continue to advance, yet the intensity of postoperative pain remains significant, impeding swift patient recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in postoperative pain and recuperation between patients receiving intrathecal morphine paired with low-dose bupivacaine and those administered general anesthesia exclusively. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 patients, who were allocated into three groups: Group M (5 µg/kg morphine intrathecal injection), Group B (5 µg/kg morphine combined with bupivacaine 3 mg intrathecal injection) and Group C (intrathecal sham injection). The primary outcome was the assessment of pain relief using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Additionally, intraoperative remifentanil consumption was quantified at the end of the surgery, and postoperative opioid use was determined by the number of patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) compressions at 48 h post-surgery. Both the efficacy of the treatments and any complications were meticulously recorded. RESULTS: Postoperative NRS scores for both rest and exercise at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h were significantly lower in groups M and B than in group C (P<0.05). The intraoperative remifentanil dosage was significantly greater in groups M and C than in group B (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between groups M and C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative propofol dosage across all three groups (P>0.05). Postoperative dosages of both sufentanil and Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were significantly less in groups M and B compared to group C (P<0.05). The time of first analgesic request was later in both groups M and B than in group C (P<0.05). Specific and total scores were elevated at 2 days postoperative when compared to scores at 1 day for all groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, at 1 day and 2 days postoperatively, both specific scores and total scores were higher in groups M and B compared to group C (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Intrathecal administration of morphine combined with bupivacaine has been shown to effectively ameliorate acute pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: ChiCTR2200058544, registered 10/04/2022.